APWU does not support new USPS Safety Ambassador Program | PostalReporter.com
t

APWU does not support new USPS Safety Ambassador Program

03/16/2018The APWU was informed on October 26, 2017 of the Postal Service’s intent to roll out a new program called the Safety Ambassador Program. The Postal Service intends to replace the safety captain program, and any other local safety programs, with this “standardized” and nationally controlled program. The American Postal Workers Union does not support, agree with, or endorse this program.

Using their latest catch phrase—employee engagement—the Postal Service claims that this program “will focus on employee engagement, training, communication, hazard identification/abatement, and accident reduction.” Having a safe workplace is every worker’s right and you must fight for that right! However, the Safety Ambassador Program appears to be nothing more than an end-around our currently negotiated joint union-management safety procedures.

We have multiple issues with the program including, but not limited to, the following:

  • Rather than encouraging that safety hazards be reported on PS Form 1767, the Service encourages “verbal” reporting of hazards where there would be no record or tracking of the hazard. Written records are the basis for showing the hazard was reported.
  • Ambassador selection would be at sole discretion of installation head (manager, postmaster) without any union input. Many locals have elected officers and appointed officials who are responsible for safety. We also have reports from the field that management has instructed those making selections to specifically avoid using union representatives and “agitators.” It has been reported that the Postal Service is encouraging its managers to select employees who are not active in their unions as ambassadors.
  • Ambassadors are supposed to be “volunteers.” However, multiple reports from the field are showing that employees are being forced to become Ambassadors.
  • Local Safety and Health Committees are not part of the program.
  • Ambassadors would participate in creating Job Safety Analysis (JSA) which is currently the function of Article 14 Safety and Health Committees.
  • Ambassadors will be observing their coworkers, telling them they are being unsafe, and providing feedback and coaching to them, as well as reporting back to the supervisors on their coworkers’ actions.
  • Ambassadors will be trained on the use of the USPS Safety Toolkit which again is in the purview of the Safety and health Committees.

The APWU has initiated an Article 19 appeal to arbitration on the implementation of this program (Q15C-4Q-C 18055498). We believe the Service has violated Article 5 Prohibition of Unilateral Action (past practice of safety programs and failure to negotiate), Article 14 Safety and Health, Article 19 Handbooks and Manuals, ELM Chapter 8. Questions on the dispute should be directed to the Article 14 officers at headquarters, Lynn Pallas-Barber and Terry Martinez. Copies of all relevant documents were sent to the NBAs in the field.

We request that any local or state organization that has Safety and Health Committees immediately file a grievance that the Safety Ambassador program is a violation of Article 14 and the negotiated Safety and Health Committee processes as well as Article 1 Union Recognition – that the APWU is the exclusive bargaining representative for those we represent. Safety programs are subject of bargaining and the union must be included in the decisions about any safety program. Grievances should also be initiated where employees have been involuntarily required to act as ambassadors. No one is required to be an ambassador and they can decline the offer to be one. Any grievances on this issue held, pending the Article 19 appeal, must be held at Step 3 only, to provide better tracking.

The APWU believes strongly that your workplace must be a safe place to work. We believe bargaining unit member participation is important to a safe work place and that we all need to act together to make sure it is.  As an individual and in groups you should be able to feel that you can act through using 1767s, workroom floor actions, and filing grievances. You should not have to go through a management-appointed intermediary in order to have a safe workplace!

As the Postal Service remains the most dangerous place to work of all federal agencies in the country, we must fight for our rights to have fair, reasonable, and successful safety programs. The Safety Ambassador Program does not fit that description as it was fully developed and implemented by management while completely ignoring your union.

SA_large-story

USPS recruiting volunteer ambassadors- USPS News Link

11 thoughts on “APWU does not support new USPS Safety Ambassador Program

  1. just another reason to fund my DRIP accounts with Scottrade (now TD) packages are the future and the following 3 are the king of package delivery- UPS, FEDX & AMZN…………leaving the Postal Circus in the dust. the others take care of business, postal circus is in the weeds with this nonsense. maybe once they should put all their effort into making money……….nah, that would never happen. what do you think will happen if someone in govt ever wakes up and says we are not going to fund this money loser anymore.

  2. only thing they know how to do is rearrange the deck chairs on the HMS Titanic. when I see a really bad safety issue that they will nor address, I just drop a dime and call OSHA.

    • If you want to have OSHA address any issue you need to write them a letter, phone calls are next to useless! Just like the USPS safety program!!! You 1767 an issue and managements reply is that it is up to EMPLOYEES to work safely! Priceless!!

      • Craft just uses 1767s to feel like they have some authority. Spend 10 minutes drafting up a snarky little paragraph when you could have just abated the issue in 10 seconds…because, you know, safety is everyone’s responsibility.

  3. Haha. That’s a funny article. Must be slow times at the P.O. to focus on this stuff

  4. Just another way for the toolbags to divert attention
    away from themselves and put all the blame on the Crafts.
    This will allow more vermin to scurry through the plants
    and Aos.This is just another waste of time and money.
    The A##kissers will love this program. If the toolbags
    would just follow the safety measures and rules already
    in place the toolbags would save time and money by not
    having to create a redundant program. Maybe they will
    serve muffins at the meetings.

  5. This is the same employer that wouldn’t let the employees call 911. The postal police were required to make the call. Remember what happened in Oakland ,Ca. when a clerk was injured? It took management 20 minutes to call for help. The clerk died and the Department of Labor fought the wife over death benefits. And as for verbal notices of safety hazards, that will go to nothing. Where is the proof that the hazard was ever reported?

  6. You are sadly mistaken. “We” have not been ”instructed” by anyone to avoid using union members as safety ambassadors! Matter of fact, One of our ambassadors is a union rep, & safety captain! He has no problem with the new ”catch phrase”, because he IS engaged in keeping a safe work environment without repercussions for reporting any and all safety issues that potentially could become a hazard here at the plant. So before you spew your demon seeds, make sure you have ALL of your facts right. Or is this simply rhetorical nonsense to get someone re-elected?

  7. I support anything like this that management does because it’s just another opportunity to show just how stupid management is, go for it.

Comments are closed.