02/25/2016 –Hearing Room is Cleared When Secret Documents Are Discussed
Before the NLRB hearing got underway.
A National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) hearing on charges that the Postal Service illegally subcontracted work to Staples resumed on Feb. 24 – after months of procedural wrangling – and finally got to the substance of the dispute.
In an opening statement, the APWU offered its perspective on the case: The Postal Service’s decision to allow Staples employees to perform the work of USPS retail clerks was motivated in large part by management’s desire to save money on labor costs. The union was never offered the opportunity to negotiate over the program, and therefore the USPS violated its duty to bargain in good faith.
The Postal Service asserted that the goal was simply to expand customers’ access to retail services and therefore, management had no obligation to bargain with the union over the program.
But the first and only witness of the day, APWU Manager of Negotiations Support Phil Tabbita, testified about numerous USPS documents that revealed that management’s goals in the Staples program included reducing labor costs by transferring the work of window clerks to Staples employees. He was questioned by NRLB Region 5 General Counsel Daniel M. Heltzer, who is representing the NLRB in the complaint against the Postal Service.
The Postal Service’s attorney repeatedly objected to the General Counsel’s line of questioning, but Administrative Law Judge Paul Bogas overruled the majority of the objections.
Observers Cleared
The Postal Service claimed that two of the internal documents were so confidential that the hearing room had to be cleared of observers before Tabbita could be questioned about them. Judge Bogas temporarily granted the request to keep the documents sealed, but said he would revisit the designation later. The judge’s ruling prohibits the APWU from reporting on the documents, at least for now.
Among the observers cleared from the hearing room were activists from New York, Philadelphia and Washington, DC, wearing Stop Staples T-shirts. “We came because we want to preserve postal jobs with good benefits and not give them to low-benefit jobs,” said Carol Thomas, a retired Training Technician from New York. “We wanted to show our support for the cause,” added Rosa Greene, a retired Window Clerk.
“Stop Staples” activists fron New York City.
“The Postal Service should end its dirty deal with Staples and stop efforts to privatize retail operations,” said APWU President Mark Dimondstein. “Our country deserves public postal services that are provided by well-trained USPS employees who are accountable to the people.”
The case arose after the APWU filed an Unfair Labor Practice charge with the NRLB. The hearing is expected to continue for several days.
For background on the NLRB case, see:
Secret Document Exposes USPS Privatization Planning
Hearing on USPS-Staples Deal Dominated by Legal Wrangling
USPS, Staples Produce a Mound of Documents
NLRB Calls Interference on Staples
The simple facts r that after about four-years;Staples has not become the local post-office central. Staples has not become,an alternative place 2 pick up a missed parcel or a registered or certified letter. That would have been USPS’S logical next step. That hasn’t happened. Likely because Staples has closed conveniently located stores,while virtually no USPS stations;have closed since 2009. And anyone,who has actually been inside a Staples lately knows that postal products r hardly promoted at all. It’s the same 4 United Parcel’s services. This fight is a bit outdated,as is former PMG’S Donahue’s 2010 proposal of in-store post-offices. 4 better or worse,is commomplace in Canada.