According to the Office of Inspector General, the US Postal Service cannot locate 35 trailers leased from contractors. The OIG has issued over 19 reports covering leased trailers from March 30, 2001, through September 28, 2009.:
The purpose of this alert is to bring to your attention the need for the U.S. Postal Service to immediately inventory and account for its leased trailers in the Northeast Area. We are issuing this alert due to the urgency associated with protecting leased trailers to avoid unnecessary lease and residual value expenses for lost trailers, especially in light of the Postal Service’s financial constraints.
During the course of our project announced in March 2014, Procurement and Use of Common Fleet Trailers – Northeast Area (Project Number 14XG025NO001), we became aware of 35 trailers from the New Jersey Network Distribution Center (NDC) in the Northeast Area that could not be located. Additionally, the Postal Service could not locate any record that they received these trailers from the leasing company even though the trailers were identified at some point in their manual tracking processes.
The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General (OIG) has been expressing concern about the Postal Service’s controls over leased trailers since 2001. The OIG has issued over 19 reports covering leased trailers from March 30, 2001, through September 28, 2009. The reports identified the need for a comprehensive process to routinely identify trailer needs and return unneeded trailers to the leasing contractor; use leased trailers only to move mail and equipment; fully use the satellite-tracking system and tracking devices to locate leased trailers, and safeguard trailers in secured locations. While Postal Service management has taken action in the past to periodically identify and return unused trailers, it has not established an effective inventory system to record and track trailers or to ensure local facilities routinely identify and return unused trailers. Due to our prior findings, continued concerns, and the expense associated with the missing leased trailers of $287,374, we referred this matter to the OIG’s Office of Investigations.
Owned and leased trailers are one of the most cost-effective ways to move large volumes of mail and related equipment. The Postal Service spent more than $39 million in fiscal year (FY) 2013 for leased trailers. Today, about 17 trailer suppliers provide more than 10,000 leased trailers nationally to the Postal Service. Currently, the Postal Service does not have a policy or an inventory system for its leased trailers.
In 2011, the Postal Service established the Delivering Results, Innovation, Value, and Efficiency (DRIVE) initiative. As part of Initiative 1, Optimize Network Operations, the Postal Service established goals for reducing its trailer fleet by 35 percent.6 As a result, plants in the Northeast Area began assessing leased trailer inventory and trailer requirements. During this inventory process, the New Jersey NDC performed an inventory of all trailers on record as having been received to account for them and identify their location. Unfortunately, they could not account for the 35 leased trailers. They were initially determined to be missing and after an extensive search for these trailers, they were subsequently classified as lost.
We confirmed that Postal Service officials in the Northeast Area were unable to account for 35 trailers and could not provide documentation of ever receiving the trailers from the leasing company. The Postal Service continued paying lease costs of $249,454 for the trailers for 2 years (October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2013),7 even though it could not validate their location or use during that period. We confirmed that New Jersey NDC and Northeast Area officials searched for the missing trailers,8 and the search did not reveal any records of trailer movements. As a result, the Postal Service stopped the monthly lease payments in October 2013 and paid the trailer supplier $37,920 for the residual value9 of the 35 trailers. They received the titles in April 2014 for the lost trailers.
We performed our own analysis of the data for the 35 missing trailers in the Transportation Information Management Evaluation System (TIMES)10 and Surface Visibility (SV)11 systems, and confirmed no record of trailer movements or use in Postal Service operations.
Officials were unable to account for these trailers because:
The Postal Service does not have an adequate process to document that leased trailers have been delivered and accepted;
The Postal Service does not have an inventory system for leased trailers or a process to periodically validate the number of leased trailers on hand;
The Postal Service is sometimes inconsistently labeling trailers and incorrectly entering trailer identification numbers or temporary identification numbers12 into SV and TIMES, resulting in incomplete and inconsistent data needed for tracking; and
The missing trailers did not have satellite-tracking devices so that area and plant managers could track them.
During our review, we determined that Postal Service Headquarters’ management intends to consolidate leased trailer information in a central database for integration with other systems for better tracking and tracing of leased trailer inventory. Integration relates to the Postal Service’s systems – SEAM (Solution for Enterprise Asset Management) and GPS (Global Positioning System). However, this effort is still in the planning phase.
Because the Postal Service was unable to locate the 35 missing trailers or show details on trailer utilization, we estimate the Postal Service unnecessarily paid $124,72713 annually in leasing costs, or $249,454 over 2 years. In addition, the Postal Service unnecessarily paid an additional $37,920 in damages to the supplier to replace these lost trailers. See Appendix A for details on system and process weaknesses.
We recommend the vice president, Network Operations, in coordination with the vice president, Supply Management:
1. Implement its plans to consolidate leased trailer information into a central database to clearly document receipt of the leased trailer assets and to improve tracking and tracing of leased trailer inventory.
2. Develop a process to identify trailers that are not being used and ensure unused trailers are promptly returned to suppliers to avoid unnecessary lease expenses.
3. Develop an interim tracking system and provide written instructions to plant management requiring them to routinely inventory and account for all leased trailers.
4. Require local facilities to have suppliers place numbers that meet the U.S. Postal Service’s specifications for numbering on leased trailers for ease of identification and tracking through consistent and accurate data.
5. Ensure all leased trailers are equipped with satellite-tracking devices and issue policy and provide training on the features and functionality of the satellite-tracking system for leased trailers, including functionality of the related web-based management system to help track and manage leased trailers.
Postal Service Can’t Find 35 Leased Trailers in Northeast Area (PDF)
totally unremarkable, its only now that the P.O. can track a package. FedEx , UPS have been doing it since the 90’s
Inspector 19 – You made me smile. I can see the look on Tony’s face when an ambitious young relative announces that he has heisted 35 trailer loads of bulk mail consisting of expired sale papers. “Where you wan’ me to put this stuff, Tony?”
Who’s running this place you ask?
It comes back non supervision 101… Vision being a key word.
Start out with brown paper bag training.
Not favoritism/relative/lover stupidvision that is the rule.
Seeing this young my $hit don’t stink PSE convert to supervisor standing next to his abusive MDO uncle is the norm.
PO management has a cancer that has pledged the PO for decades.
So much more has been lost then these trailers over the years. Anyone with years in know.
Seriously, they paid for 2 years before realizing??? If I don’t have something I stop payment. No wonder the PO is losing money. Time to clean house starting at the top.
yes but the USPS has enough money for thousands of new scanners to track the letter carriers in real time, look out for the LOW’s that are soon to be issued
I still get my bonus right guys? OK, I’m the Postmaster General so my first question is,What they look like? Male or female? How long they be on the job? LUNCH !!!
who’s running this company ? Nobody , there’s the problem !!!
Blame the Soprano’s
Not to worry; this involves mgmt., so there will be no accountability.
Look under your nose. They are probably sitting at one of your docks and is used to store empty equipment so never get scanned. Or they may be full of 2001 Catalogs that haven’t been delivered yet. They probably never got delivered or received and the leasing companies and postal managers are sharing the gain.
and no one will be held accountable………but God forbid a letter carrier misses an MSP scan
At the USPS “Every Day is like our First Day in Business”
So Postal management lost 35 trailers. Is someone in management going to be disciplined for this failure? They will wind up with a soft “job” in Washington,Deceitful. It’s terrible a carrier can’t be blamed!
This is what happens when you let everyone pull the mail, postal driver drivers first, use them as your eyes