USPS, Staples Deal Still a Secret — But Hearing Reveals Disturbing Truths | PostalReporter.com
t

USPS, Staples Deal Still a Secret — But Hearing Reveals Disturbing Truths

apwulogo213The Postal Service and Staples are working overtime to keep the details of their sweetheart deal a secret, but a hearing before the National Labor Relations Board — and documents the USPS was forced to provide to the APWU — have revealed some disturbing truths.

“Staples and postal management are perpetrating a fraud on the American people,” said Clint Burelson, APWU Clerk Craft director. “They are promoting the deal as though taking your mail to Staples is the same as taking it to the Post Office.

“It’s not,” he said.

The 58-page agreement between the USPS and Staples [PDF], which management provided to the APWU in response to the union’s Unfair Labor Practice charge [PDF] , exposes some of the risk to customers, he said.

The page above is typical of about half of the pages in the copy of the agreement that was provided to the union.

“But it hides more than it illuminates. The secret deal is still a secret.” Most of the significant details in the Approved Postal Provider Pilot Agreement are redacted.

“The Postal Service belongs to the people of the country,” said APWU President Mark Dimondstein. “What are they hiding? And how can they justify operating in the dark?”

‘Thoroughly Dishonest’

The hearing exposed how thoroughly dishonest Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe has been about the purpose of the deal, said Burelson, who testified about the union’s request for information about the program.

In a Jan. 19 Associated Press article, Donahoe rejected the union’s claim that the program constitutes privatization. He is quoted as saying, “The privatization discussion is a ruse. We have no interest in privatizing the Postal Service.”

But a December 2012 internal USPS document that was presented at the hearing shows that management is indeed seeking to privatize window clerk duties. The Approved Shipper Plus Pilot Program Memo says,

“The pilot will be used to determine if lower costs can be realized with retail partner labor instead of the labor traditionally associated with retail windows at Post Offices…

“Transferring USPS product and service transactions to retail partner locations should allow USPS to cut costs associated with window labor time and credit card transaction fees. Initial analysis suggests that Retail Partners can sell USPS products and services at a projected cost-to-serve of $0.16 per revenue dollar, which is less than a third of the cost-to-serve observed at traditional Post Offices.”

Smoking Gun

“That’s the smoking gun,” Burelson said. “Clear away the ‘management-speak’ and the message is clear: The Staples deal is intended to sidestep USPS labor costs by transferring window duties to private businesses. Management’s internal document admits it.

“That’s privatization,” he said.

“I hope every postal worker understands exactly how serious the threat is – to our jobs and to the United States Postal Service as a public institution,” President Dimondstein added. “We have to make sure the American people understand as well.”

The Staples “pilot program” is just the beginning, he pointed out. The Jan. 19 Associated Press article also quotes Donahoe as saying he’d like to see post office counters in every Staples store “as soon as possible.”

And it’s not just Staples. The Approved Shipper program “aims to establish USPS customer access points in leading national and regional retailer’s store locations nationwide.”

Following a Pattern

At the hearing, USPS witness Brian Code testified that the Retail Partner Expansion Program, which Staples is part of, had been in development at least since 2011, when he joined the Retail Alliances Department.

According to Code, postal executives studied postal retail trends in Germany, Great Britain, Sweden, Australia, Canada and other countries, and used them as models for the program.

What do those countries’ mail systems have in common? Their retail operations are largely privatized. According to a 2011 report [PDF] by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), postal retail operations were privately owned and operated, as shown below.

Germany 98%
Sweden 88
Australia 81
Canada 39

(Great Britain’s Royal Mail, which is mostly privatized, was not included in the GAO study. A March 25 article in the Huffington Post reported that the British mail agency has eliminated 1,600 jobs; increased the price of stamps by 35 percent; sold postal data into private hands, and granted the company’s boss a pay raise of 1.5 million pounds.)

A Rude Awakening

Some of the more startling admissions at the hearing should make customers think twice before turning over their mail to Staples, Burelson said. “Customers who take their mail to Staples stores are putting it in jeopardy.”

Packages dropped off at Staples stores will be placed in unsecured containers, he pointed out, and, as the Approved Postal Provider Agreement notes, packages and letters at Staples stores are not considered “mail” until they are picked up by the Postal Service. “That means they don’t enjoy the protection of the U.S. Mail,” Burelson said.

The 58-page agreement reveals Staples is getting a discount on postal products, he pointed out, but customers will pay full price. The amount of the discount is redacted.

Code testified that Staples’ low-wage employees get just four hours of “classroom” training for postal retail duties, Burelson noted.

Postal retail clerks receive 32 hours of intense classroom training, followed by 40 hours of on-the-job training alongside experienced window clerks. And postal workers must pass a test before they are considered qualified to work the window, he said.

“It takes a long time to learn all the intricacies necessary to provide expert customer service: the postage needed for various classes of mail and for mail of various sizes and shapes; how quickly letters and packages can be expected to arrive at their destination; how to screen for hazardous material that shouldn’t be mailed, etc.,” he said.

“Management claims this program is about customer convenience,” Burelson said. “If that were true, they would insist on staffing the postal counters at Staples with highly-trained, experienced window clerks, who have sworn an oath and are accountable to the people. If it were about customer convenience, the Postal Service would keep existing post offices open longer and would staff post offices with enough employees to avoid long lines.”

The April 1 hearing was the result an Unfair Labor Practice charge filed by the APWU when postal management refused to provide information about the deal that established “postal” counters in more than 80 Staples stores — staffed with low-wages Staples employees.

Administrative Law Judge Eric M Fine, who presided over the hearing, set May 5 as the deadline for the union and management to submit briefs.

 

15 thoughts on “USPS, Staples Deal Still a Secret — But Hearing Reveals Disturbing Truths

  1. Not even close Shoe Shine Boy. I’ve forgot more about a days work than you’ll ever know mgmt. slug.

    Until there is accountability for the millions that mgmt wastes and steals yearly, nothing will change.

    Have a nice day 204b breath.

  2. all just static…….hedge against this dump and buy FDX and UPS stock……..have been since 1999 and have not been sorry. UPS $95 FDX $135 USPS $0.00

  3. And…here’s a shocker. APWU isn’t exactly chomping at the bits to negotiate terms of another exodus that will deplete their coffers and staffing. That…would be suicide for them. Sorry!

  4. Why just now is it a problem? Because APWU has suffered a big hit to its coffers in the last 5 years…because APWU had no answer to USPS’ actions & moves…because APWU lemmings are bailing out in droves…because Diamondstein has to create a smoke screen of doing something about all of this even if its a photo op…because APWU knows that even if Staples bails out, no APWU jobs will come from it…because Diamondstein knows he hung the Motor Vehicle Craft out to dry when he represented private sector drivers in their quest to take jobs away from MVS…because Diamondstein is a political animal who believes he can make the masses think something is being actually accomplished by the APWU however, in the end, the old adage applies, “What have you done for me lately?” Yeah- so he gets those few APWU members to march alongside other unions and college students taking labor courses who have no clue but ask yourself at the end of it all…what did you get for me? Jobs? Really? 10-20% of APWU’s remaining members want to know one thing, “When can I leave?” or “Give me money and I’ll go now.” This does not bode well for APWU coffers and union officer salaries and lifestyles! But hey…keep paying dem dues!

  5. All Your TSP Belong To Us:

    I read your messages on a number of these posts and you continue to bash USPS management. There’s no doubt in my mind that you are a craft employee on OWCP, and sitting home collecting wages when you should be at work. You’re the PROBLEM loser, not the solution. It’s because of people like you that the PO is in the financial straits it’s in, not because of Mgmt.

    The NALC/APWU Mantra.

  6. get real = Issa wannabe

    If there is an article on Postal Reporter,
    get real is sure to comment, bashing
    unions in the process.

    Have you thanked your union today
    for your great wages and benefits?
    Didn’t think so, selfish one.

    Get over losing that petty grievance!

    Get a life, get real!

  7. It appears to be another company the postal service is helping at the expense of its employees and customer’s. We normally pay more compared to what we receive which put the postal service at a disadvantage.

  8. I find it odd that the APWU would, in 2014, be having a problem with this. USPS has been doing this or similar things, outsourcing the retail clerk jobs, for 20-30 yrs, so why just now is it a problem? The APWU had no problem when the PO went to contract stations in drug stores and grocery stores in the past, so why now is it a problem? It seems a bit hypocritical, to say the least.

  9. Whats going on with the Union attacking Staples….I’ve never heard of the Unions complaining about USPS’S biggest competitor UPS selling postal products, and trust me they sell alot……biggest reason lack of long lines and people who actually seem to want to help plus they can compare prices and get the best deal.
    My guess is stuff they sell for UPS gets a USPS label slapped over theirs and they pocket the difference, oh wait they just print their label and USPS delivers them with UPS on the label.
    Don’t hear the letter carrier Union complaining about the USPS picking up mail at UPS and delivering UPS parcels. I guess for it to be accurate neither does the APWU…Go figure !

  10. So much for the guaranteed sanctity of the U S Mail. Why does
    Mr Donohoe feel the need for secrecy if he is not trying to kill
    The Post Office system we have relied upon since the beginning
    of the United States of America – our Constitutional right.

  11. This should be a no-brainer for Judge Fine. This is
    one more attempt to chip away at privitizing the service.
    If the postal service cares about their customers then
    they would also realize that trained postal window clerks
    are a necessity to fill these positions to avoid customer
    dismay and potentially losing customers to competitors. All
    business that the postal service intends to pursue should be
    provided with the intent to create a great customer experience.
    I would be remiss not to suggest that this will not happen using
    staples employee’s who most likely could care less and who don’t
    have the years of experience in all facets of customer experience.
    There is more involved then a quick synopsis of what to do and
    then throw an employee in front of a customer. This has disaster
    written all over it. Starting with the acceptance, product knowledge, courtesy, efficiency, postage inadequacies, revenue protection, securing the mail, and delivery. Congress should step in on this with the realization that as conceptually sound of an
    idea it is to promote more business it is also to risky not to
    employ experienced postal window clerks whose forte it is to perform
    these duties. Customer service is the lifeline of any business and
    ours is no different.

Comments are closed.