USPS sets date for implementation of Network Rationalization, Phase II | PostalReporter.com
t

USPS sets date for implementation of Network Rationalization, Phase II

donahoecooThe basic logic of Network Rationalization is that falling mail volumes and the resultant excess capacity in the Postal Service’s mail processing network necessitate a major consolidation of the network, and this task in turn is contingent on revisions to service standards, particularly the overnight standard for First-Class Mail.

On December 5, 2011, the Postal Service submitted a request to the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) for an advisory opinion on the service changes associated with Network Rationalization, in accordance with 39 U.S.C.

3661(b). On December 15, 2011, the Postal Service published proposed revisions to its market-dominant service standards in the Federal Register and sought public comment (the Proposed Rulemaking). The comment period for the Proposed Rulemaking closed on February 13, 2012. The final rule was published on May 25, 2012.

Having considered public input and the results of its market research, the Postal Service decided to implement Network Rationalization in a phased manner. The service standard changes associated with the first phase of Network Rationalization became effective on July 1, 2012.

[5] In a Federal Register notice dated January 24, 2014, the Postal Service announced its decision to postpone implementation of the second phase of Network Rationalization, and to identify the implementation date for the second phase at least 90 days before it takes effect. [6] This document identifies the implementation date for the second phase of Network Rationalization, and the corresponding service standard changes.

The Postal Service’s market-dominant service standards are contained in 39 CFR part 121. This document revises the service standards by identifying the implementation date for the service standards associated with the second phase of Network Rationalization, and by modifying 39 CFR 121.1(b)(2) to clarify that the 2-day service standard for First-Class Mail includes intra-SCF single piece First-Class Mail. [7] The revision concerning the second phase implementation date is applied by replacing “the effective date identified by the Postal Service in a future Federal Register document” with “January 5, 2015” each place where “the effective date identified by the Postal Service in a future Federal Register document” appears in the current version of 39 CFR part 121, and in Appendix A to that part. The 2-day service standard for First-Class Mail is clarified through the addition of a reference to “intra-SCF single piece domestic First-Class Mail properly accepted before the day-zer0-CET” in paragraph 121.1(b)(2). In addition, conforming non-substantive edits were made.

First-Class Mail.

(a)(1) Until January 5, 2015, a 1-day (overnight) service standard is applied to intra-Sectional Center Facility (SCF) domestic First-Class Mail® pieces properly accepted before the day-zero Critical Entry Time (CET), except for mail between Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, mail between American Samoa and Hawaii, and mail destined to the following 3-digit ZIP Code areas in Alaska (or designated portions thereof): 995 (5-digit ZIP Codes 99540 through 99599), 996, 997, 998, and 999.

(2) On and after January 5, 2015, a 1-day (overnight) service standard is applied to intra-SCF domestic Presort First-Class Mail pieces properly accepted at the SCF before the day-zero CET, except for mail between Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and mail destined to American Samoa and the following 3-digit ZIP Code areas in Alaska (or designated portions thereof): 995 (5-digit ZIP Codes 99540 through 99599), 996, 997, 998, and 999.

(b)(1) Until January 5, 2015, a 2-day service standard is applied to inter-SCF domestic First-Class Mail pieces properly accepted before the day-zero CET if the drive time between the origin Processing & Distribution Center or Facility (P&DC/F) and destination Area Distribution Center (ADC) is 6 hours or less; or if the origin and destination are separately in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; or if the origin or destination is in American Samoa or one of the following 3-digit ZIP Code areas in Alaska (or designated portions thereof): 995 (5-digit ZIP Codes 99540 through 99599), 996, 997, 998, and 999.

(2) On and after January 5, 2015, a 2-day service standard is applied to intra-SCF single piece domestic First-Class Mail properly accepted before the day-zero CET, inter-SCF domestic First-Class Mail pieces properly accepted before the day-zero CET if the drive time between the origin P&DC/F and destination SCF is 6 hours or less, Presort First-Class Mail properly accepted before the day-zero CET with an origin and destination that are separately in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and intra-SCF Presort First-Class Mail properly accepted before the day-zero CET with an origin or destination that is in American Samoa or one of the following 3-digit ZIP Code areas in Alaska (or designated portions thereof): 995 (5-digit ZIP Codes 99540 through 99599), 996, 997, 998, and 999.

* * * * *

3.Section 121.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
§ 121.2 Periodicals.

(a) End-to-End.

(1)(i) Until January 5, 2015, a 2- to 4-day service standard is applied to Periodicals pieces properly accepted before the day-zero Critical Entry Time (CET) and merged with First-Class Mail pieces for surface transportation (as per the Domestic Mail Manual (DMM)), with the standard specifically equaling the sum of 1 day plus the applicable First-Class Mail service standard;

(ii) On and after January 5, 2015, a 3- to 4-day service standard is applied to Periodicals pieces properly accepted before the day-zero CET and merged with First-Class Mail pieces for surface transportation (as per the DMM), with the standard specifically equaling the sum of 1 day plus the applicable First-Class Mail service standard.

* * * * *

4.Appendix A to Part 121 is amended by revising the introductory text of Tables 1 through 4 to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 121—Tables Depicting Service Standard Day Ranges Back to Top

* * * * *

Table 1. Prior to January 5, 2015, end-to-end service standard day ranges for mail originating and destinating within the contiguous 48 states and the District of Columbia.

* * * * *

Table 2. On and after January 5, 2015, end-to-end service standard day ranges for mail originating and destinating within the contiguous 48 states and the District of Columbia.

* * * * *

Table 3. Prior to January 5, 2015, end-to-end service standard day ranges for mail originating and/or destinating in non-contiguous states and territories.

* * * * *

Table 4. On and after January 5, 2015, end-to-end service standard day ranges for mail originating and/or destinating in non-contiguous states and territories.Show citation box

* * * * *

Federal Register

8 thoughts on “USPS sets date for implementation of Network Rationalization, Phase II

  1. David Westgard, former Treasurer of American Postal Workers Union (APWU) Local 65 (located in Mendota Heights, Minn.), was sentenced to 20 days of imprisonment followed by two years of supervised release and was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $4,241. Westgard had previously paid restitution in the amount of $22,719. On November 12, 2013, Westgard pled guilty to one count of Theft – Indifferent to Owner Rights.

  2. Captain Donahoe at the wheel of the good ship USPS Titanic continues to head for the iceberg

  3. While the USPS is revisiting standards for mail delivery, alas there is no mention of standards of upper level managers, but that’s well known and another story.
    You want to increase revenue? Quit giving those ridiculous rates to direct market mailers and circulars. It doesn’t take an economics major to understand that losing money just getting marriage mail delivered isn’t worth the business in the first place. But direct market mailers have powerful buddies and grease whatever wheel needs it to get those rates. That is the only thing that makes sense about deliberately accepting business that costs more money to deliver than the rates pay.
    And, this really gets in my craw: stop subsidizing (i.e., free postage) for so called non-profit mailers. Most are religious charlatans dedicated to separating gullible people from what little money they have, or send circulars to all customers trying to force people into their way of religious belief. This is the biggest mail fraud scam going, and to make their postage free of charge or even paying them is unthinkable. The Postal Inspection Service should be all over crooked TV evangelical mailings or “churches” that don’t even physically exist but send out crap like prayer cloths, little religious trinkets and other cheap junk and let the money roll in. Far be it from me to stop legitimate individual church mailings to members, but fraud is fraud, and to let these people get away with it is inexcusable.
    But nobody asked me and in all probability nobody gives a shit, but hey, I’m entitled to an opinion.

  4. Great idea! Slash service & drive away more customers! Shame on you Donahoe!!! What an excuse for an PMG!

  5. The words “usps” and “rationalization” should never be used in the same sentence.

Comments are closed.